Skip to content

Water Quality Technical Report — WESTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES, WI

PWSID
WI7370163
Population
16,000
Source
Groundwater
Data Period
Last Updated
WESTON Water Quality Overview

A note from the author — I'm Jacob Thorwolf. WaterAdvantage.org is a personal project of mine, separate from my day job as an Account Executive at Bottleless Nation, a commercial water filtration company. If you request a consultation through any form on this site, it comes to me or a colleague at BN. More about this project →

Summary

WESTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES serves approximately 16,000 people in WESTON, Wisconsin. Based on contaminant analyses from DNR, WQP, EPA ECHO, EPA UCMR5, 1 contaminant has been measured above federal EPA standards (MCL) and 4 exceed health-based guidelines. The most significant finding is PFOA (Perfluorooctanoic Acid) at 0.0059 ug/L, which is 1.5x the EPA legal limit. Data is drawn from source-level compliance monitoring and covers 2002 through 2026. Results reflect conditions at the point of collection (wells, treatment plants), not necessarily at the tap.

Key Findings

Understanding the two thresholds

EPA Legal Limit (MCL)

The highest level of a contaminant allowed by federal law. Utilities that exceed this threshold face enforcement action. Limits balance health risk against the cost of treatment, so they are not always set at levels considered safe by independent researchers.

Health Guideline

The level below which independent researchers (CalEPA, WHO, EWG) believe there is no known health risk. Guidelines are not legally enforceable but are typically stricter than legal limits — often by 10x or more for contaminants like arsenic and lead.

A reading can be below the EPA limit (legally compliant) while still exceeding health guidelines (above levels considered safe by independent researchers).

Exceeds Health Guidelines

These contaminants were detected below the EPA legal limit but above a health-based guideline from a public health agency (CalEPA OEHHA, WHO, or similar). Health guidelines are non-enforceable research-backed targets that are often stricter than the legal limit.

Detected contaminants
ContaminantResultUnitHealth GuidelineEPA Legal LimitSourceSample Date
Lead (90th Percentile)
Developmental delays in children, kidney damage, high blood pressure. There is no safe level of lead exposure.
750ng/L20015000
Pending rule: LCRI 2024Action level drops from 15 → 10 µg/L effective 2027; full lead service line replacement within 10 years (EPA Lead & Copper Rule Improvements, October 2024)
EPA ECHO(2+ years ago)
Uranium
Increased risk of cancer, kidney toxicity
Per-source breakdown (7 sampling locations)
  • Sampling locationMost recent valueSample date
  • Well 7971 ng/L3/9/26
  • Well 8304 ng/L3/9/26
  • Well 2171 ng/L3/9/26
  • Well 5146 ng/L3/9/26
  • Well 6102 ng/L3/9/26
  • Well 20079 ng/L3/9/26
  • Well 174 ng/L3/9/26
971ng/L50030000DNR
Radon
Radon is a known human carcinogen. Inhalation of radon released from water during showering and other household use is the primary exposure route; ingestion contributes a smaller stomach cancer risk.
412pCi/L300Not regulatedDNR(3+ years ago)

PFAS: 1.9 ng/L detected.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of manufactured chemicals that persist in the environment and accumulate in the human body. The EPA set enforceable limits for six PFAS compounds in April 2024, with a compliance deadline of 2029. PFAS compounds measured above EPA standards appear in the Above Federal Standard section above. The value shown in the heading is the combined PFOA + PFOS concentration reported by Wisconsin DNR (a legacy 2016 EPA Health Advisory metric, not a current MCL).

Detected contaminants
ContaminantResultUnitHealth GuidelineEPA Legal LimitSourceSample Date
6:2 FTS5.2ng/LEPA UCMR5(14 months ago)
PFBA (Perfluorobutanoic Acid)
Shorter-chain PFAS with faster elimination. Thyroid effects in animal studies.
5.4ng/LNot publishedNot regulatedEPA UCMR5
PFBS (Perfluorobutane Sulfonate)
Thyroid effects, reproductive and developmental effects, kidney effects.
Per-source breakdown (8 sampling locations)
  • Sampling locationMost recent valueSample date
  • Well 122 ng/L8/13/25
  • Well 510 ng/L8/13/25
  • Well 47.6 ng/L9/30/25
  • Well 2004.99 ng/L6/2/22
  • Well 64.7 ng/L8/13/25
  • Well 83.6 ng/L11/13/24
  • Well 23.5 ng/L8/13/25
  • Well 72.5 ng/L11/13/24
7.6ng/LNot publishedRegulated via Hazard Index (HBWC 2,000 ng/L)DNR
Pfhxa3.6ng/LEPA UCMR5
PFHxA (Perfluorohexanoic Acid)
Limited toxicological data. Potential liver and developmental effects.
3.3ng/LNot publishedNot regulatedDNR
PFHxS (Perfluorohexane Sulfonate)
Associated with thyroid disease, reproductive effects, and immune system changes.
Per-source breakdown (7 sampling locations)
  • Sampling locationMost recent valueSample date
  • Well 20012.7 ng/L6/2/22
  • Well 55 ng/L8/13/25
  • Well 14 ng/L8/13/25
  • Well 72.9 ng/L11/13/24
  • Well 22.8 ng/L8/13/25
  • Well 81.9 ng/L11/13/24
  • Well 40.72 ng/L9/30/25
0.72ng/L1010DNR
PFNA (Perfluorononanoic Acid)
Linked to developmental effects, liver damage, and immune system changes.
Per-source breakdown (3 sampling locations)
  • Sampling locationMost recent valueSample date
  • Well 10.76 ng/L8/13/25
  • Well 2000.225 ng/L6/2/22
  • Well 40.225 ng/L6/2/22
0.76ng/L1010DNR
PFOS (Perfluorooctane Sulfonate)
Linked to liver damage, thyroid disease, immune system effects, and increased cholesterol. Classified as a possible human carcinogen.
Per-source breakdown (8 sampling locations)
  • Sampling locationMost recent valueSample date
  • Well 20030.2 ng/L6/2/22
  • Well 58.1 ng/L8/13/25
  • Well 24.9 ng/L8/13/25
  • Well 13.7 ng/L8/13/25
  • Well 41.9 ng/L9/30/25
  • Well 71.4 ng/L11/13/24
  • Well 81.3 ng/L11/13/24
  • Well 60.8 ng/L8/13/25
1.9ng/L04DNR
Pfpea4.5ng/LEPA UCMR5

Microplastics

Microplastics have been documented in raw and treated drinking water worldwide, but federal regulations do not currently require testing — so there is no data specific to this system. Standardized methods and rules are in progress.

Other Regulated Contaminants

These contaminants were detected within federal standards (EPA Maximum Contaminant Levels). They are presented for transparency.

Total Trihalomethanes (TTHMs) (LRAA): 23.74 ug/Lwithin limit of 80 ug/L

EPA Stage 2 DBPR — Locational Running Annual Average, system-wide, based on 8 samples across 4 quarters (2022Q3 · 2023Q3 · 2024Q3 · 2025Q3).

Disinfection byproducts are regulated as a running average under Stage 2 DBPR, not as individual samples. A single sample exceeding the MCL is not itself a compliance violation — the annual running average is the enforceable metric.

Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) (LRAA): 5.41 ug/Lwithin limit of 60 ug/L

EPA Stage 2 DBPR — Locational Running Annual Average, system-wide, based on 8 samples across 4 quarters (2022Q3 · 2023Q3 · 2024Q3 · 2025Q3).

Disinfection byproducts are regulated as a running average under Stage 2 DBPR, not as individual samples. A single sample exceeding the MCL is not itself a compliance violation — the annual running average is the enforceable metric.

Detected contaminants
ContaminantResultUnitHealth GuidelineEPA Legal LimitSourceSample Date
Chlorine (free)
Eye/nose irritation, stomach discomfort
610ug/L40004000DNR
Gross Alpha Radiation (excluding Radon and Uranium)
Increased risk of cancer
Per-source breakdown (5 sampling locations)
  • Sampling locationMost recent valueSample date
  • Well 70.868 pCi/L3/9/26
  • Well 60.518 pCi/L3/9/26
  • Well 2000.163 pCi/L3/9/26
  • Well 80.028 pCi/L3/9/26
  • Well 10.026 pCi/L3/9/26
0.774pCi/LNot published15DNR
Barium
Increase in blood pressure
Per-source breakdown (7 sampling locations)
  • Sampling locationMost recent valueSample date
  • Well 1140 ug/L3/9/26
  • Well 598 ug/L3/9/26
  • Well 20064 ug/L3/9/26
  • Well 645 ug/L3/9/26
  • Well 840 ug/L3/9/26
  • Well 237 ug/L3/9/26
  • Well 736 ug/L3/9/26
140ug/L10002000DNR
Fluoride (natural)
Bone disease, mottled teeth in children
Per-source breakdown (7 sampling locations)
  • Sampling locationMost recent valueSample date
  • Well 52.2 mg/L3/9/26
  • Well 60.6 mg/L3/9/26
  • Well 10.6 mg/L3/9/26
  • Well 2000.2 mg/L3/9/26
  • Well 80.096 mg/L2/15/23
  • Well 70.066 mg/L2/14/23
  • Well 20.058 mg/L7/19/23
2.2mg/L44DNR
Combined Radium (226+228)
Increased risk of cancer
1.65pCi/L05DNR
Nitrate (as N)
Blue baby syndrome in infants
3.1mg/L1010(as N)DNR
Arsenic
Skin damage, circulatory problems, increased risk of cancer
260ng/L410000WQP(2+ years ago)
Chromium (total)
Note: total chromium includes the harmless trivalent form (Cr-III). The toxic hexavalent form (Cr-VI) has no federal MCL; California set a 10 µg/L Cr-VI MCL in 2014.
Allergic dermatitis
860ng/L100000100000WQP(2+ years ago)
Atrazine
Cardiovascular system or reproductive problems
25ng/L1503000DNR(3+ years ago)
Nitrite (as N)
Blue baby syndrome in infants
85ug/L10001000(as N)DNR(3+ years ago)

Unregulated Detected Contaminants

These contaminants were detected but do not have a federal Maximum Contaminant Level. They are monitored for awareness, not compliance.

Inorganics — Metals and Minerals

Detected contaminants
ContaminantResultUnitHealth GuidelineEPA Legal LimitSourceSample Date
Silver
Prolonged high exposure can cause argyria (blue-gray skin discoloration) but is not associated with cancer or organ damage. EPA has no enforceable health-based MCL for silver.
450ng/L0.1 mg/L100000DNR
Nickel
Allergic dermatitis, lung and nasal effects
2.1ug/L12Not regulatedDNR

PFAS — Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances

Detected contaminants
ContaminantResultUnitHealth GuidelineEPA Legal LimitSourceSample Date
PFHpA (Perfluoroheptanoic Acid)
Limited human data. Part of the broader PFAS family; persistence and bioaccumulation suspected.
1.7ng/LNot publishedNot regulatedDNR
PFHpS (Perfluoroheptane Sulfonate)
Limited human data. Part of HI calculation as of 2024 NPDWR.
0.663ng/LNot publishedNot regulatedDNR(3+ years ago)
PFPeS (Perfluoropentane Sulfonate)
Limited toxicity data. Short-chain PFAS.
1.02ng/LNot publishedNot regulatedDNR(3+ years ago)
6:2 FTS (6:2 Fluorotelomer Sulfonate)
Limited human data. Potential thyroid and liver effects.
7ng/LNot publishedNot regulatedDNR(3+ years ago)
PFPeA (Perfluoropentanoic Acid)
Limited toxicity data. Shorter-chain PFAS.
7.5ng/LNot publishedNot regulatedDNR(3+ years ago)

Other Substances

Detected contaminants
ContaminantResultUnitHealth GuidelineEPA Legal LimitSourceSample Date
Copper (90th Percentile)
Gastrointestinal distress at high levels. Long-term exposure can cause liver or kidney damage.
82ug/L3001300DNR(2+ years ago)

Other Potential Contaminants

Not detecting a contaminant does not prove it isn't present — it only means the laboratory didn't test for it, or tested below the reporting limit. Many substances of emerging concern are not routinely monitored because federal regulations haven't caught up to the science.

Compliance History

Formal EPA and DNR compliance events on record for this utility. Includes all events from the last 10 years plus any unresolved violations regardless of age. Health-based violations are legally enforceable thresholds that were exceeded; procedural events are monitoring or reporting lapses that don't indicate contamination by themselves.

0 health-based2 procedural
Nitrate
Monitoring & Reporting

Apr 1, 2023 – Jun 30, 2023

E. coli (RTCR)
Reporting (Consumer Confidence)

Oct 1, 2009 – ongoing

Source: EPA ECHO enforcement and violation records (via Envirofacts / SDWIS Federal Reports).

Action Steps

This system has contaminants above a legal limit or multiple health guidelines. The following steps are concrete things a homeowner or facility operator can do right now — starting with the most important non-commercial options.

  1. Request the utility's Consumer Confidence Report (CCR). The CCR compares utility-reported readings to the federal legal limits and is independent of this site. Utilities must make it available on request. EPA CCR search.
  2. Get a certified tap test. A state-certified laboratory can test your tap for a specific contaminant or a broader panel. A single-contaminant test runs in the low tens of dollars; a comprehensive panel runs several hundred. Ask for the EPA-certified lab list from Wisconsin DNR. Wisconsin DNR lab certification.
  3. Consider point-of-use filtration. For the specific contaminants detected in this system, the exceedance sections above list the technology categories (reverse osmosis, granular activated carbon, ion exchange, etc.) that target each class. Those are category-level descriptions — the right choice depends on the contaminant profile, budget, and installation constraints.
  4. Contact the utility directly. Ask about the specific contaminants you're concerned about and request the most recent sampling data. The EPA SDWIS portal lists utility contact details. EPA SDWIS system lookup.
  5. Check the utility's lead service line inventory. Under the Lead and Copper Rule Revisions (LCRR, 2024), utilities must publish a service line inventory identifying lines flagged as lead, galvanized-requiring-replacement, or unknown material. If your service line is flagged or unknown, the utility is required to replace it on a scheduled timeline. EPA Lead and Copper Rule Improvements.

Historical Well Retirements

These wells were previously part of this system and recorded notable contamination during their active years. They are no longer in service.

WESTON retired Well VX771 in February 2026. During its active years, the well recorded PFOS (Perfluorooctane Sulfonate) detections up to 47.4 ng/Labove the EPA maximum contaminant level of 4 ng/L.

Frequently Asked Questions

What contaminants are in WESTON water?

Based on available public monitoring data, 106 contaminants have been tested in WESTON's water supply. 31 were detected above reporting limits. The most notable detections include Chlorine (free), Silver, Nickel. This data comes from source-level compliance monitoring at wells and treatment plants.

Does WESTON water meet EPA standards?

Based on available public monitoring data, 1 contaminant was measured above federal EPA standards in source-level monitoring. This does not necessarily indicate a formal violation — the EPA uses running averages and other criteria for compliance determinations. Data comes from wells and treatment plants, not tap-level measurements.

Is WESTON WI water safe to drink?

Based on source-level compliance monitoring, 1 contaminant was measured above federal standards. However, compliance monitoring tests water at wells and treatment plants, not at individual taps. An on-site test is the only way to know what reaches your tap, as conditions can vary based on plumbing, blending, and distribution.

Does WESTON water have PFAS?

Yes, PFAS compounds have been detected in source monitoring for WESTON's water supply: PFBS (Perfluorobutane Sulfonate) (7.6 ng/L), PFHxS (Perfluorohexane Sulfonate) (0.72 ng/L), PFNA (Perfluorononanoic Acid) (0.76 ng/L), PFOS (Perfluorooctane Sulfonate) (1.9 ng/L). PFAS are a group of manufactured chemicals that do not break down in the environment. The EPA set enforceable limits for several PFAS compounds in 2024.

Does WESTON water have lead?

No. WESTON's most recent Lead and Copper Rule testing found a 90th-percentile lead level of 0.00075 mg/L, which is below the EPA action level of 0.015 mg/L. That means at the systemwide level, lead is not exceeding the enforcement threshold. Lead levels can still vary significantly by individual building — older homes and schools with legacy plumbing can have much higher readings than the system average.

Cross-check against the official record

This report is our read of the public monitoring data. Every Wisconsin utility also publishes an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) — a plain-language summary written by the utility itself, usually mailed with a water bill or posted on the utility's website. If anything in this report surprises you, request WESTON MUNICIPAL UTILITIES's latest CCR directly from the utility, or browse the underlying compliance data on the Wisconsin DNR portal.

Data Sources and Methodology

Wisconsin DNR Compliance Monitoring

State-level drinking water compliance testing. Covers all regulated contaminants for community water systems. Source-level monitoring at wells and treatment plants. Individual result links are provided for each contaminant in the tables above.

Water Quality Portal

Cooperative service by USGS, EPA, and NWQMC. Regional groundwater monitoring data from nearby wells — may not reflect this specific utility.

EPA ECHO Lead & Copper Rule

90th percentile measurements from EPA Enforcement and Compliance History Online. Based on tap-level sampling at high-risk sites.

EPA UCMR5

Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, Fifth cycle. Per-analyte PFAS results from utility-level sampling.

Definitions

Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL)
The highest level of a contaminant allowed in drinking water, set by the EPA. MCLs are legally enforceable standards.
Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG)
The level of a contaminant below which there is no known or expected health risk. MCLGs are non-enforceable public health goals.
Action Level
The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements. Used for lead and copper.
Health Advisory
Non-enforceable guidelines set by the EPA providing information on contaminants that can cause health effects at certain exposure levels.
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
A measure of all dissolved minerals, salts, and organic matter in water, expressed in mg/L (ppm). Not a health hazard but affects taste and indicates overall mineral content.
PFAS
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. A group of manufactured chemicals that do not break down in the environment. The EPA set enforceable limits for several PFAS compounds in 2024.
Non-Detect (ND)
The contaminant was tested for but not found above the laboratory's reporting limit. This does not mean zero — it means below the detection threshold.
VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds)
Chemicals that evaporate easily and can contaminate groundwater. Sources include gasoline, industrial solvents, and dry cleaning fluids. Some are regulated by the EPA; many are monitored but not yet regulated.

Download Data

Cite This Report

WaterAdvantage. "Water Quality Technical Report: WESTON, WI (WI7370163)." WaterAdvantage.org, 2026-04-14. https://www.wateradvantage.org/report/WI7370163/detail

Curious about filtration for your home or facility? I work at Bottleless Nation during the day and I'm happy to take a look. Submit the form below and I or a colleague will reach out — the consultation is free, and if it turns into a sale, I earn a commission.

Get a free filtration consultation